AMX DAS-MI-0608 Manual de usuario Pagina 7

  • Descarga
  • Añadir a mis manuales
  • Imprimir
  • Pagina
    / 10
  • Tabla de contenidos
  • MARCADORES
  • Valorado. / 5. Basado en revisión del cliente
Vista de pagina 6
she had known personally (Pommer, 1967; Winkel-
mann and Schagen, 2009). Another option could
have been that the anatomists from the very begin-
ning of the NS regime refused to work with the
bodies of its victims and use only traditional body
sources as previously used. Such a refusal of collab-
oration could have been successful, as the biologist
Alfred Ku
¨hn
suggested after the war for his own dis-
cipline (Peiffer, 2004; p 147/148), and Peiffer did for
neuropathology (Peiffer, 1997; p 52). However, the
anatomists did not do so, because they saw no ethi-
cal problem in their actions. They had lost the ability
to ‘‘recognize the divine spark and image in every
human being’’ (Cohen and Werner, 2009) and did
not or could not see that the medical utilization of
victims’ bodies was a postmortem humiliation that
became part of the victims’ biographies (Winkel-
mann, 2008). These scientists had stopped looking
‘‘beyond [their] science’’ and failed to ‘‘examine the
circumstances and implications of [their] work’’
(Cohen and Werner, 2009). They could not see that
the theory and practice of their science was entirely
dependent on the political system it existed in, and
that the scientists’ competence not only in their sci-
ence but also in politics and ethics was a prerequisite
for the freedom of science. As a result, they lost this
freedom.
Some postwar consequences of the NS period are
not yet fathomable. The anatomists’ teaching and
working at German and Austrian anatomical depart-
ments after the Second World War were principally
the same as those of the NS period. A handful of
very active National Socialists had been dismissed,
others, who were initially dismissed in 1945, soon
returned to their field of work. Only few of the anato-
mists expelled in 1933 returned after the war. Thus
the anatomy of the 1950s, 60s, and 70s was mostly
in the hands of anatomists who had trained and
worked in the Third Reich, and as academic teachers
they must have impressed their younger colleagues
and students with their words and actions (Kater,
1987; p 45). Were they able to change their thinking
and their ethics? It is unclear at this point, how and
in what manner these men (and very few women)
may have shaped the research, teaching, and ethics
of postwar German anatomy. If they had a negative
influence, this has diminished over time. The discus-
sion and detailed research of the history of anatomy
in the Third Reich finally started in the later 20th
century, and German anatomy today parallels very
much international positive developments of the dis-
cipline in terms of the ethical treatment of bodies for
dissection. Since the institution of body donation
programs in the 1960s and 1970s, all bodies used
for dissection in German anatomical departments are
donated bodies, and commemorative services are
held to pay respect to the donors. Also, the new gen-
eration of German anatomists has shown a height-
ened ethical awareness in terms of their NS history
and lessons to be learned from it (e.g., Aumu
¨ller
and
Grundmann, 2002; Winkelmann and Schagen,
2009).
This first overview of the available literature on
the anatomy in the Third Reich shows a complex
relationship between anatomists and the ruling NS
regime. It was much the same as that of physicists,
biologists, chemists, and biochemists, one of com-
promise and collaboration that ensured the continu-
ity of the individual collaborating scientist’s work
(Deichmann, 1996; p 327; Deichmann, 2001). Mark
Walker summarized: ‘‘The German scientific commu-
nity and most of its members entered a Faustian
pact with National Socialism, trading financial and
material support, official recognition, and the illusion
of professional independence for conscious or uncon-
scious support of NS policies culminating in war, the
rape of Europe, and genocide’’ (Walker, 1995; p
269).
This study also points to areas that still need
further research:
historical investigations of all German or for-
merly German anatomical institutes, specifically
concerning their use of bodies during the NS re-
gime and the political activity of the anatomists,
identification of all NS victims used in anatomi-
cal institutions,
research into the NS history of other basic medi-
cal sciences to compare with the alleged special
political activity of anatomists,
further exploration of the historical relationship
between anatomy and physical anthropology,
eugenics/racial hygiene, and genetics,
study of the professional and personal corre-
spondence of anatomists of the NS period to
determine any awareness of responsibility and
guilt, or lack thereof, concerning their activities
during this time,
research into the possible influence of anato-
mists of the NS period on postwar anatomical
practice and ethics,
evaluation of the impact of anatomical practices
during the NS period on former medical stu-
dents, and
exploration of all German archives of govern-
mental and professional Institutions and Univer-
sity Departments of Anatomy and other medical
subdisciplines that were involved in the use of
human bodies during the time period.
The research so far shows that the story of NS
anatomy is one of a medical science that lost its bal-
ance between clinical detachment and empathy, and
whose ethics and actions became perverted, justi-
fied, and instrumentalized by a criminal regime.
Depending on the political situation and the ability of
psychological and political insight of the individual
anatomist, this history has the potential to repeat
itself at any time. ‘‘Humaneness is not a good that
the society or medicine of a certain time period can
just claim for itself, but one that has to be perma-
nently worked for to be maintained’’ [translation by
author] (Druml, 1999; see also Horn and Malina,
2002). Thus, all modern anatomists are constantly
called upon to evaluate their own balance of clinical
detachment and empathy in their daily work with the
bodies of humans, and at the same time evaluate
their position within the context of their societies. A
912 Hildebrandt
Vista de pagina 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Comentarios a estos manuales

Sin comentarios