AMX DAS-MI-0608 Manual de usuario Pagina 6

  • Descarga
  • Añadir a mis manuales
  • Imprimir
  • Pagina
    / 10
  • Tabla de contenidos
  • MARCADORES
  • Valorado. / 5. Basado en revisión del cliente
Vista de pagina 5
human bodies had been sparked by Gunther von
Hagens’ plastination exhibits in Germany (Hilde-
brandt, 2008), and laws regulating the handling of
materials of questionable ethical background were
deemed insufficient. The recommendations include
the detailed investigation and removal of specimens
of doubtful ethical provenance from collections.
Institutes were searched for ‘‘material" stemming
from the NS period, which included wet specimens
and bones, as well as histological slides. The identi-
fied items were then removed from the collections
and interred in graves of honor; in addition, places
of remembrance were created and the public was
informed about the process (e.g., Malina and Spann,
1999; Fro¨ber, 2006).
DISCUSSION
A look at publications from the time period shows
that anatomists in NS Germany used the bodies of
the executed not only for teaching purposes but also
in their research. In terms of the value of this
research it can be said that as long as anatomists
were concerned with matters of general concepts of
anatomy and morphological research, their work
showed a certain level of professional competence
and often strong engagement (Grundmann and
Aumu
¨
ller, 1996). However, whenever they taught
racial hygiene and also pursued research in this dis-
cipline, their concepts became compromised by a
field that was based on weak scientific evidence as
well as ideological stereotypes and conjectures. Men-
delian inheritance in race had never been really pro-
ven, and the only other methodological approach,
twin research, was fraud with its own problems
(Kater, 1989; p 227; Mai and van den Bussche,
1989). On the whole, much of the anatomical work
during the Third Reich lacked in innovation. The
story of the anatomy in the Third Reich demon-
strates once more that the biomedical sciences were
not destroyed by the National Socialists, but that
certain areas were suppressed while others were
encouraged (Proctor, 1992; Walker, 2003). Although
some of anatomy’s theory and practice suffered sup-
pression, namely the dynamic concept of racial
hygiene by Saller, most of it was encouraged either
by intent of the regime, as in the subject of racial
hygiene, or by chance opportunity, as in the avail-
ability of a plentiful body supply.
A preliminary answer to the question why the
anatomists readily used so many of the bodies of NS
victims is complex. As a result of the political situa-
tion, the traditional ethics of physicians and academ-
ics were newly molded by the ethics of the NS
regime. As early as 1938, Hartshorne stated in an
analysis of the relationship between German univer-
sities and government that civil servants were no
longer politically neutral and were held to a political
doctrine that mixed scientific fact and fiction (Hart-
shorne, 1938). The NS regime ‘‘unleashed its
destructive forces’’ (Proctor, 1992) on anatomy by
first undermining traditional ethical values and then
giving legal opportunities for the commitment of
crimes and a plentiful body supply. It transformed
many anatomists working in NS Germany into oppor-
tunistic collaborators of a criminal regime. In terms
of the consequences for contemporary anatomy and
its ethics, it is most important to look at the science
of anatomy and its personnel as a whole. The ethical
questions connected with Hermann Stieve’s
research, a scientist who was not a party member
but exploited the bodies of NS victims for his
research, have more relevance for modern ethics
than those connected with the SS-officers and mur-
derers Hirt and Kremer (Winkelmann, 2008).
Indeed, the fact that most anatomists and physicians
were not psychopathic criminals, but scientists who
thought they were right, is especially disturbing
because they were not madmen (Kudlien, 1985;
p 197). It also has to be noted that their work was
completely legal at the time, even Hirt’s and
Kremer’s ‘‘work.’’ However, in the anatomy of the
Third Reich, thousands of bodies of NS victims fell
prey to a postmortem medical utilization that
reached from anatomical institutions to concentra-
tion camps (postmortale Verwertungsmedizin:
Herber, 1989; Malina and Spann, 1999). Anatomists
in NS Germany were part of this process and at least
partially responsible for these actions. This responsi-
bility includes the use of bodies of executed NS vic-
tims in anatomical research. The neuropathologists
showed the same attitude as anatomists, and Peiffer
stated that their use of the brains of the euthanasia
victims for scientific purposes might have given
these killings the appearance of a justified criminal
act (Peiffer, 1997; p 51). Indeed, Hallervorden him-
self compared his work to that of the anatomists and
thought it morally correct (Peiffer, 1997; p 52). In
the political situation of NS Germany, any preexist-
ing balance between clinical detachment and empa-
thy in these physicians was destroyed. The medical
sciences were instrumentalized by the NS regime,
and most of the academics working in medicine
willingly submitted to this, thereby sacrificing their
traditional ethical convictions. The NS medical
profession was not without ethics, but had ‘‘a lot of
bad ethics’’ (Proctor, 2000; p 342) as seen from a
modern point of view.
The question remains whether the anatomists had
an alternative and whether they could have realized
the point at which their traditional use of the bodies
of the executed and the unclaimed became under
the NS regime not just quantitatively but also quali-
tatively different from their work under any other
previous government. It seems that at least in the
beginnings of the Third Reich, in 1933, academic re-
sistance to the political system was possible within
certain limits without dire consequences (Zimmer-
mann, 1991; p 400; Hess, 2005; p 47). One could
also change one’s field of research, as in the case of
Ferdinand Wagenseil, who withdrew from his racial
hygienic studies in protest of what he saw as a cor-
ruption of the field of racial hygiene by NS ideology
(Unger, 1998). In addition, there is one report of a
young anatomical researcher, Stieve’s assistant
Charlotte Pommer, who in December 1942 decided
to change her career plans after having had to
attend the dissection of an executed woman whom
911Anatomy in the Third Reich: Part 3
Vista de pagina 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Comentarios a estos manuales

Sin comentarios